The New Pac-10 [Pac-16]
Arizona
Arizona State
Cal
Oregon
Oregon State
Stanford
UCLA
USC
Washington
Washington State
Texas
Oklahoma
Texas Tech
Oklahoma State
Colorado
This conference set-up is almost a forgone conclusion. Unless something crazy happens in Texas this weekend, come Tuesday the Pac-10 will become the Pac-16 [Can they really call themselves Pac if they stretch all the way to Texas?].
The New Big 10 [Big 16]
Ohio State
Iowa
Penn State
Michigan
Michigan State
Northwestern
Nebraska
Wisconsin
Purdue
Minnesota
Illinois
Indiana
Missouri
Notre Dame
Syracuse
Rutgers
The first part of the new Big 10 is also already decided. Nebraska joined today and even though they haven't been offered yet, Missouri can't be far behind. With Nebraska on board, the Big 10 then has two main goals left, capture Notre Dame and the New York City market. The NYC problem comes first and will help bring in Notre Dame. By bringing on Rutgers and Syracuse (both of which are AAU schools), the Big 10 gets Gotham and brings down the Big East simaltaneously. And Notre Dame has said they will remain independent as long as the Big East is viable. However, with the Big East failing, Notre Dame will be forced to align itself with the Big 10 [which may very well keep the name Big 10 post-expansion since they have actually have had 11 members for 20 years].
The New SEC
Alabama
Arkansas
Auburn
Florida
Georgia
Kentucky
LSU
Ole Miss
Mississippi State
South Carolina
Tennessee
Vanderbilt
Texas A&M
Florida State
Miami
Clempsun [Clemson]
This is the first of my really speculative picks. It seems fairly likely that Texas A&M will join the SEC, leaving the conference at 13 members. Since conferences work better with even numbers and the Big 10 and Pac-10 will have 16 members, the SEC will forced to expand as well. And with the exception of the North Carolina schools, they will have their pick of the ACC. I picked FSU, Miami, and Clemson to go because they have a larger national audience and are more SEC -like than Georgia Tech.
The New ACC
Boston College
Duke
Georgia Tech
Maryland
North Carolina
NC State
Virginia
Virginia Tech
Wake Forest
Connecticut
Pittsburgh
South Florida
Poor, poor ACC. Under this scenario, they've had three of their flagship programs robbed. Luckily, the dead Big East had some members available for the taking. Connecticut is the best fit because they have a great basketball team and even though the ACC is a second rate football conference, no amount of expansion will kill their dominance of basketball. Pitt and South Florida round out the ACC because they are a better fit than any of the other Big East teams. Plus, USF makes up for some of the Florida market the ACC lost when FSU and Miami bolted for greener (as in $) pastures.
The New Big 12/ Mountain West/ Big East [The Big Mountain East Conference]
Baylor
Iowa State
Kansas
Kansas State
Cincinnati
Louisville
West Virginia
TCU
BYU
Utah
Memphis
Boise State
Of all my picks, this conference is the least likely. There is no unifying geographical area or type of school. In fact, the only thing these schools have in common is they are the losers of the conference realignment [except for Memphis who will sieze this opportunity to jump into the BCS]. Still, all of these teams joining forces is the surest way to guarantee they all stay athletically relevant. If they don't, some of these teams will surely end up on the outside looking in.
Obviously, the BCS will need to evolve to accomodate these conference changes [The best part of the move to 16 team conferences is that they make a playoff that much easier]. Since one automatic bid over 16 teams is too little, the new BCS will feature 2 automatic bids for the SEC, Pac-16, and Big-16. Because they are smaller (and weaker), the ACC and Big Mountain East will have 1 automatic bid. The other two bids will be decided through the same rules currently employed by the BCS.
This is great except Miami pledged to never leave the ACC ( http://espn.go.com/blog/ncfnation/post/_/id/23102/miami-ad-the-acc-is-our-home ).
ReplyDeleteThis Athletic Director saying this does not mean it's a sure thing but I would bet Miami stays and next on the pecking order is GT or VT
oh and also, if the new 'big mountain east conference happened, i would rather watch those match-ups than the pac-16. it would be amazing except for the athlete's having to travel 12+ hour bus rides.
ReplyDeleteI don't know about that. The prospect of Texas and Oklahoma versus USC every year is pretty tempting (ignoring the fact that USC's sanctions are sure to hurt them). And I'll be honest, I didn't know Miami's AD said that. That being said, since when can you take these guys at their word. Plus, I think FSU and Miami are a package deal that the SEC would really like. But you make some good points.
ReplyDelete